· 1/13/1960
Royden v. Ardoin
Citations
- 331 S.W.2d 206
- 160 Tex. 338
- 3 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 149
- 1960 Tex. LEXIS 618
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an attorney is not entitled to compensation when he abandons his client without just cause before the proceeding for which he was retained has been conducted to its termination
- stating that an attorney is not entitled to compensation when he abandons his client without just cause before the proceeding for which he was retained has been conducted to its termination
- stating that an attorney is not entitled to compensation when he abandons his client without just cause before the proceeding for which he was retained has been conducted to its termination
- stating that an attorney who abandons his client before the proceeding for which he was retained has been completed, or who commits a material breach of the employment contract, is not entitled to compensation for his services
- stating that an attorney who abandons his client before the proceeding for which he was retained has been completed, or who commits a material breach of the employment contract, is not entitled to compensation for his services
- stating that an attorney who abandons his client before the proceeding for which he was retained has been completed, or who commits a material breach of the employment contract, is not entitled to compensation for his services
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Culver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.