Royce v. Hoening

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiffs’ “inconvenience and expenses demonstrate no greater hardship than that suffered by any litigant in similar proceedings”
• plaintiffs “claims of reputational harm, humiliation, anxiety ... demonstrate no greater hardship than that suffered by any litigant in similar proceedings”
• plaintiffs'\inconvenience and expenses demonstrate no greater hardship than that suffered by any litigant in similar proceedings\
• where it was noted that there is no abuse of process where an individual, with malicious intent or otherwise, does no more than initiate and prosecute an action to its authorized conclusion (citing Tomash v. John Deere Indus. Equip. Co., 399 N.W.2d 387, 390-91 (Iowa 1987))
• declining invitation to abandon “outdated” special-injury rule
• declining invitation to abandon \outdated\ special-injury rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).