Skip to main content
· 6/30/2005

Roybal v. Los Alamos National Bank

Citations

  • 375 F. Supp. 2d 1324
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13800
  • 2005 WL 1554700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Federal common law, rather than state contract law, governs SFIP interpretation .... ‘Thus, a complaint alleging breach of a[] SFIP satisfies § 1331 by raising a substantial federal question on its face.’ ”
  • substantial question of federal law not involved simply because the state court might have to interpret federal law or look to the scope of SFIP coverage to determine if insurer owed a legal duty under state law to procure the SFIP

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.