· 6/30/2005
Roybal v. Los Alamos National Bank
Citations
- 375 F. Supp. 2d 1324
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13800
- 2005 WL 1554700
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Federal common law, rather than state contract law, governs SFIP interpretation .... ‘Thus, a complaint alleging breach of a[] SFIP satisfies § 1331 by raising a substantial federal question on its face.’ ”
- substantial question of federal law not involved simply because the state court might have to interpret federal law or look to the scope of SFIP coverage to determine if insurer owed a legal duty under state law to procure the SFIP
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.