Royal v. Parado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellee’s action in invoking the equitable remedy of rescission of a deed “would operate primarily as a coercive, in personam action against the appellants.”
• holding that because the appellee's action in seeking the equitable rescission of a deed was not instituted primarily to seek transfer of title to the property in dispute, the local action rule was not applicable
• permitting a court of equity to entertain an action to cancel and rescind a quitclaim deed to parcels of land located in another county
• action for rescission or cancellation of contract for sale or exchange of land is transitory, not local action required to be brought where land located
• action for rescission or cancellation of contract for sale or exchange of land is transitory, not local action required to be brought where the land is located
• “[C]ourts of equity having jurisdiction of the person of a party have exercised the power to compel him to perform a contract, execute a trust, or undo the effects of a fraud . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).