Royal v. Harnage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that for practical reasons, doctors involved in the care of a patient must be free to share information about the patient
• reviewing by certiorari a discovery order that purportedly violated the statutory physician-patient privilege
• “We are not inclined to believe that [the statute] bars all discussion between a health care provider and his or her attorney concerning an upcoming deposition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).