Skip to main content
· 2/4/1981

Royal v. Clemons

Citations

  • 394 So. 2d 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]he Legislature did not incorporate within the statutory amendment a clear expression of intent for retroactive application.... As such, the amendment could never be the subject of retroactive application”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Downey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.