· 2/4/1981
Royal v. Clemons
Citations
- 394 So. 2d 155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[t]he Legislature did not incorporate within the statutory amendment a clear expression of intent for retroactive application.... As such, the amendment could never be the subject of retroactive application”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Downey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.