Royal United Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases upholding Commerce’s practice of notifying unnamed exporters from the relevant NME that they will be subject to the results of the review as part of the NME entity unless they establish their separate rate status
• “It is, of course, axiomatic that this Court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to Subsection 1581® to adjudicate a cause of action under the APA.”
• “It is, of course, axiomatic that this Court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to Subsection 1581(i) to adjudicate a cause of action under the APA.”
• an experienced importer had “more than sufficient constructive notice” by published Federal Register statement concerning all unnamed exporters conditionally covered by potentially revised antidumping rate that its entries could be affected by the administrative review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).