· 6/2/2005
Royal Surplus Lines Insurance v. Brownsville Independent School District
Citations
- 404 F. Supp. 2d 942
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38712
- 2005 WL 3441229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the federal summary judgment standard rather than the state standard
- applying the federal summary judgment standard rather than the state standard
- \[T]he concept of a 'no evidence' summary judgment neither accurately describes federal law nor has any particular import in . . . federal summary judgment procedure.\
- “[T]he concept of a ‘no evidence’ summary judgment neither accurately describes federal law nor has any particular import in . . . federal summary judgment procedure.”
- “[T]he concept of a ‘no evidence’ summary judgment neither accurately describes federal law nor has any particular import in the vernacular of federal summary judgment procedure.”
- “The concept of a ‘no evidence’ summary judgment neither accurately describes federal law nor has any particular import in the vernacular of federal summary judgment procedure.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hanen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.