Skip to main content
· 6/2/2005

Royal Surplus Lines Insurance v. Brownsville Independent School District

Citations

  • 404 F. Supp. 2d 942
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38712
  • 2005 WL 3441229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the federal summary judgment standard rather than the state standard
  • applying the federal summary judgment standard rather than the state standard
  • \[T]he concept of a 'no evidence' summary judgment neither accurately describes federal law nor has any particular import in . . . federal summary judgment procedure.\
  • “[T]he concept of a ‘no evidence’ summary judgment neither accurately describes federal law nor has any particular import in . . . federal summary judgment procedure.”
  • “[T]he concept of a ‘no evidence’ summary judgment neither accurately describes federal law nor has any particular import in the vernacular of federal summary judgment procedure.”
  • “The concept of a ‘no evidence’ summary judgment neither accurately describes federal law nor has any particular import in the vernacular of federal summary judgment procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.