Royal & Sunalliance v. LAUDERDALE MARINE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “we find Royal’s argument that there was a common law duty to preserve the evidence in anticipation of litigation to be without merit”
• stating that in reviewing a motion to dismiss the trial court is limited to the four corners of the complaint
• setting forth the elements of a spoliation of evidence claim
• “The essential elements of a [civil] spoliation of evidence claim are: ‘(1) existence of a potential civil action, (2) a legal or contractual duty to preserve evidence which is relevant to the potential civil action, (3) destruction of that evidence, (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).