Skip to main content
· 11/17/2004

Royal Insurance Company of America v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company

Citations

  • 391 F.3d 639
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24070
  • 2004 WL 2608269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cautioning against overly narrow construction of Hardware Dealers rule, and using Hardware Dealers to determine existence of conflict between pro rata clause and excess clause and resulting liability
  • applying Texas law, and holding that a conflict between insurance policies exists so long □ as a “reasonable construction” of “other insurance” clauses would render each policy excess over the other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Smith, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.