Royal Insurance Co. of America v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• presuming that insured party, though not a named plaintiff, would be required by terms of his insurance to cooperate with insurance company
• “The weight accorded to a plaintiffs choice of venue is significantly diminished, however where the operative facts have no connection to the chosen district.”
• “The weight accorded to a plaintiff's choice of venue is significantly diminished, however where the operative facts have no connection to the chosen district.”
• “The weight accorded to a plaintiffs choice of venue is significantly diminished, however, where the operative facts have no connection to the chosen district.”
• “The weight accorded to a plaintiffs choice of venue is significantly diminished, however where the operative facts have no connection to the chosen district.”
• “The weight accorded to a plaintiffs choice of venue is significantly diminished, however where the operative facts have no connection to the chosen district.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).