· 11/13/1929
Royal Ins. v. Bailey
Citations
- 35 F.2d 916
- 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the representative charge was sufficient to support the piggybacking plaintiffs’ claims because the representative charge indicated that other claims “could reasonably be expected to grow out of” the initial allegations
- finding that an individual race discrimination charge could a support class action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hickenlooper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.