Skip to main content
· 11/13/1929

Royal Ins. v. Bailey

Citations

  • 35 F.2d 916
  • 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the representative charge was sufficient to support the piggybacking plaintiffs’ claims because the representative charge indicated that other claims “could reasonably be expected to grow out of” the initial allegations
  • finding that an individual race discrimination charge could a support class action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hickenlooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.