Royal Industries Ltd. v. Kraft Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The theory behind any such agency claim is that the subsidiary’s acts were, in both form and substance, those of the parent. Thus, there is no veil to pierce — the parent is the only party in interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).