Royal Indemnity Co. v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• painter was only in control of outside of tank it was painting and not of an interior mechanism which was damaged in the process of painting the tank
• where a contractor was hired to paint the exterior of a steel tank and the interior radial sweeper arm was damaged when a catwalk was moved in the wrong direction, there was not sufficient care, custody or control of the damaged item to warrant exclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).