Royal Indemnity Co. v. Security Guards, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding gross negligence claim not barred where limitation of liability provision limited liability for damages “caused solely by the negligence” of defendant
• addressing negligence claims asserted by insurer against third party tortfeasor in subrogation action
• addressing negligence claims asserted by insurer against third party tortfeasor in subrogation action
• security employee did not contact supervisor upon sounding of four consecutive fire alarms, instead attempting to reset alarms; genuine issue of material fact as to willful or wanton conduct
• citations and internal quotation 626 A.2d 98, 99 (Pa. 1993) (“Exculpatory clauses are generally valid only when the clause: (1) does not contravene public policy and (2) is between parties relating entirely to their own private affairs, (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).