Royal Indemnity Co. v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the policy change was valid (1) because it neither (a
• “The legal right to use property may (or may not) be probative, but it is certainly not dispositive of whether parties actually use a piece of property ‘in connection with’ their residence premises.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).