Skip to main content
· 11/23/1981

Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia v. Steamship Mount Dirfys

Citations

  • 537 F. Supp. 55
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 489
  • 10 Fed. R. Serv. 420
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that communications covered by the attorney-client privilege may be \subject to disclosure only upon a showing of truly substantial need and undue hardship\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Britt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.