Royal Barry Shaw v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that denial of significant constitutional rights rendered litigant’s court-martial judgment invalid, thereby 5 See supra n.3. 11 permitting Court of Claims to award back pay
• only “pure issues of constitutional law, unentangled with an appraisal of a special set of facts” may be considered on collateral review of courts- martial
• “[A]court- martial’s denial of a plaintiff’s fundamental constitutional rights operated to deprive it of jurisdiction and vested [the court] with the power to grant relief by way of a money judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).