Skip to main content

Roy v. State

Citations

  • 509 S.W.3d 315
  • 2017 WL 603656
  • 2017 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding defendant was entitled to lesser-included instruction on manslaughter because he presented evidence that, by driving while intoxicated with certain substances in his system, he was aware of but disregarded the risk of causing death
  • explaining, where defendant had passed out from intoxication at time of crash, that “a defendant need not be aware at the moment the result occurs if he can show that he consciously disregarded the risk of the result and the result came from the same conduct”
  • relevant evidence must affirmatively raise lesser-included offense and rebut or negate element of greater offense
  • submission of manslaughter LIO instruction was supported by direct evidence—the appellant’s testimony that he acted only recklessly
  • “Despite knowing the risks associated with drinking alcohol, smoking marihuana, and smoking dip cigarettes while driving, Roy chose to drive that night.”
  • “An instruction is required if more than a scintilla of evidence establishes [the alternative means of committing] the charged offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Hervey, Keasler, Keel, Keller, Newell, Richardson, Walker, Yeary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.