Skip to main content
· 5/3/1990

Roy v. Smith

Citations

  • 735 F. Supp. 313
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5265
  • 1990 WL 57175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing some lower courts have interpreted Lane, supra, to mean that a plaintiff may pursue an implied private right of action under section 504(a) against an Executive agency of the United States so long as the plaintiff seeks only injunctive relief (collecting cases)
  • “[U]nder the statutory scheme [a] plaintiff[] first must exhaust the administrative process under the ABA, and then seek judicial review.”
  • dismissing Rehabilitation Act claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies
  • surveying and ultimately declining to reach the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.