· 7/5/1906
Roy v. Scott
Citations
- 17 Haw. 600
- 1906 Haw. LEXIS 39
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding where Board failed to analyze credibility or probative value of claimant’s evidence
- case remanded in part for BVA to provide reasons or bases for its assessment of the lay evidence provided by the veteran and his wife
- remanded in part for the Board to provide reasons or bases for its assessment of the lay evidence provided by appellant and his wife
- remanded in part for the Board to provide reasons or bases for its assessment of the lay evidence provided by appellant and his wife
- remanded in part for failure of the BVA to analyze the credibility or probative value of the evidence
- remanded in part for the Board to provide reasons or bases for its assessment of the lay evidence provided by appellant and his wife
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frear, Hartwell, Wilder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.