Skip to main content
· 7/5/1906

Roy v. Scott

Citations

  • 17 Haw. 600
  • 1906 Haw. LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding where Board failed to analyze credibility or probative value of claimant’s evidence
  • case remanded in part for BVA to provide reasons or bases for its assessment of the lay evidence provided by the veteran and his wife
  • remanded in part for the Board to provide reasons or bases for its assessment of the lay evidence provided by appellant and his wife
  • remanded in part for the Board to provide reasons or bases for its assessment of the lay evidence provided by appellant and his wife
  • remanded in part for failure of the BVA to analyze the credibility or probative value of the evidence
  • remanded in part for the Board to provide reasons or bases for its assessment of the lay evidence provided by appellant and his wife

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frear, Hartwell, Wilder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.