Skip to main content
· 1/11/1990

Roy v. Pennsylvania State University

Citations

  • 568 A.2d 751
  • 130 Pa. Commw. 468
  • 1990 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that PSU is not a state agency within the meaning of the RTKA
  • noting there are four state-related schools in Pennsylvania, including Penn State, Pitt, Lincoln and Temple
  • holding PSU not subject to prior RTKL
  • Pennsylvania State University is not an “agency” within the meaning of the Right to Know Act, even though it, like Temple University, receives public funds
  • Penn State was considered a state-related institution under the RTKL’s predecessor, the Right-to-Know Act, rather than a state agency
  • “Currently, the Board of Trustees is composed of 32 members only 10 of whom are Commonwealth representatives. The Board of Penn State retains authority over the disposition of the corporation’s property, not subject to review by the Commonwealth.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crumlish, Colins, McGinley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.