Roy v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “to the extent such information may already be in the public domain.it cannot be withheld [under Exemption 7(D) ] because its release would create no additional risk”
• “[W]here there is a pending [postconviction] motion and the movant is seeking a new trial, the new trial constitutes a prospective enforcement proceeding that may implicate Exemption 7(A)”
• “[L]ogic suggests that the existence of a pending motion under § 2255 makes it reasonably foreseeable that an enforcement proceeding (i.e., a new trial) will take place, leading to the expectation that Exemption 7(A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).