Skip to main content

Roy v. Centennial Insurance

Citations

  • 171 Conn. 463
  • 370 A.2d 1011
  • 1976 Conn. LEXIS 1193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in construing statutes, courts are to accord “great deference” to construction given to the statute by the agency charged with enforcing it
  • ‘‘[t]his court cannot . . . by a tortured construction of the statutory . . . provisions, indi- rectly eliminate possible inequities in coverage, where the legislature has failed to do so directly’’
  • in view of the broad discretion vested by statute in the insurance commissioner for the formulation of regulations, § 38-175a-6 (d) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies was within the scope of his authority to promulgate
  • amounts received from negligent tortfeasor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barber, House, Loiselle, Bogdanski, Longo, Bakbeb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Roy v. Centennial Insurance

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.