Roy Miles Ford v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statute mandates exhaustion only when it contains \[s]weeping and direct statutory language indicating that there is no federal jurisdiction prior to exhaustion ...\
• holding that specifically worded section of Social Security Act barred district court from entertaining initial claims for benefits
• holding that when a party is required to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit, a final administrative decision is a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit
• holding that, under rational basis review, a statute is not invalid simply because it affects some persons not included within the purpose it is supposed to serve
• recognizing that a statute’s \sweeping and direct\ language barred district court federal-question jurisdiction
• holding that the prerequisite that a plaintiff proceed before the agency first before bringing suit in district court “may not be dispensed with merely by a judicial conclusion of futility”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).