Skip to main content
· 5/18/1984

Roy L. Schapansky v. Department of Transportation, Faa

Citations

  • 735 F.2d 477
  • 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2532
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[u]nevenness in application of a penalty is not a ground for invalidating it\
  • “Once an agency has made a prima facie showing, the burden of going forward with evi- dence to rebut that showing necessarily shifts to the em- ployee, who is in the best position to present explanatory evidence to counter that showing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Friedman, Rich, Smith, Nies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.