Roy L. Bourgeois v. Bobby Peters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that transborder travel is a 13 context in which compelling state interests diminish an individual’s expectation of privacy
• rejecting city’s argument that participants at a demonstration consented to search because they were not compelled to submit to search, but rather choose to participate in the protest
• rejecting general evidence of a threat of terrorism, such as the Department of Homeland Security’s elevated threat advisory level, as insufficient to justify a “special needs” exception to a suspi-cionless search
• “This is a classic ‘unconstitutional condition,’ in which the government conditions receipt of a benefit or privilege on the relinquishment of a constitutional right.”
• “[W]e conclude that one year is an insufficient amount of time for a district court, circuit court of appeals, and Supreme Court to adjudicate the typical case.”
• “The doctrine of unconstitutional conditions prohibits terminating benefits, though not classified as entitlements, if the termination is based on motivations that other constitutional provisions proscribe.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).