Skip to main content

Roy, J. v. Rue, R.

Citations

  • 273 A.3d 1174
  • 2022 Pa. Super. 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that there was no indication on the record that service to the appellant’s residence was improper, and thus, there was no fatal defect on the face of the record
  • holding that a fifty-one- day delay was untimely
  • finding no fatal defect where record reflected plaintiff sent 10-day notice to address of record, even though defendant was incarcerated
  • noting cases in which this Court has found a prompt and timely filing of the petition to open a default judgment where the delay in filing the petition was only one day, five days, or fourteen days from the receipt of notice of the entry of the judgment
  • “[I]f a party seeks to challenge the truth of factual averments in the record at the time judgment was entered, then the party should pursue a petition to open a judgment, not a petition to strike the - 10 - J-A25003-23 judgment.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, P.J.E.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.