Roy Hunter v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellant had a water right where predecessors had appropriated water for livestock in the public domain, consistent with local practice, before the land in question was designated a national monument
• holder of stockwater rights does not have right to the adjacent forage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).