· 6/2/1981
Roy E. Merritt, Cross-Appellants v. The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Dixon L. Pyles and C. R. McRae Cross-Appellees
Citations
- 649 F.2d 1013
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12688
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[D]iscovery issues are by definition pretrial matters,” and a magistrate judge has “the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) to enter non-dispositive discovery orders.”
- “[D]iscovery issues are by definition pretrial matters,” and a magistrate judge has “the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) to enter non-dispositive discovery orders.”
- “[A]n award of expenses is mandatory against a party whose conduct necessitated a motion to compel discovery…”
- magistrate judge’s postjudgment award of discovery expenses was still considered a pretrial matter pending before the court
- magistrate's award of discovery expenses after judgment is still a pretrial matter
- “[A] magistrate[judge’s nondispositive orders] are reviewable under the ‘clearly erroneous and contrary to law’ standard; they are not subject to a de novo determination as are a magistrate[judge’s] proposed findings and recommendations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Reayley, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.