Roy Daniel Garza v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a subsequent recantation does not render an excited utterance inadmissible without definitive evidence that establishes the initial statement was fabricated
• trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting statements by child victim as excited utterance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).