Roy Clifford Bebout v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “any factual findings related to [a discovery] sanction are reviewed for clear error”
• “As the Rule plainly states, litigants can escape the 4 ‘harshness’ of exclusion only if they prove that the discovery violations were substantially 5 justified or harmless.” (quoting Yeti by Molly, Ltd., 259 F.3d at 1106)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).