Roy BOX, Appellant v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to consider additional evidence “may be a basis for remand by a reviewing court”
• holding that failure to consider additional evidence “may be a basis for remand by a reviewing court”
• concluding that the Appeals Council’s determination that the new evidence was unrelated to the claimant’s condition evidences that the Appeals Council “did not consider the substance of the new evidence when it denied review of [the] claim”
• Appeals Council must consider additional evidence if new, material, and relating to time period before ALJ's decision
• “The Appeals Council must consider evidence submitted with a request for review if the additional evidence is (a) new, (b), material, and (c
• evidence of IQ test showing deterioration after period in issue not relevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).