Roxie Hollon, on Behalf of Joseph W. Hollon v. Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court will not “formulate arguments on the Plaintiff’s behalf,” but will instead “limit [its] consideration to the particular points that [Plaintiff] appears to raise in her brief on appeal.”
• holding that the Court will not “formulate arguments on the Plaintiff's behalf,” but will instead “limit [its] consideration to the particular points that [Plaintiff] appears to raise in her brief on appeal.”
• noting that a claimant must show a reasonable justification for failing to acquire and present the evidence for inclusion in the hearing before the ALJ
• finding that the claimant had not demonstrated “good cause” where she initially proceeded pro se but “was represented by counsel by the time the matter reached the Appeals Council”
• noting that, because the claimant made “little effort” to develop her arguments on appeal, the Court “decline[s] to formulate arguments on her behalf, or to undertake an open-ended review of the entirety of the administrative record….”
• limiting the court’s consideration of issues to those raised in a party’s brief and declining to formulate arguments on the party’s behalf

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).