D.C. Circuit· 4/11/1932
Roxburghe v. Burnet
Citations
- 58 F.2d 693
- 61 App. D.C. 141
- 11 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 291
- 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4749
- 1932 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9212
Judges: Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Anderson v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1933-03-13· cited 197×
- United States v. BlowSeventh Circuit· 1935-04-23· cited 16×
- Commissioner v. FreulerNinth Circuit· 1933-01-09· cited 9×
- Kearney v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1953-12-02· cited 5×
- Burnet v. WhitcombD.C. Circuit· 1933-05-22· cited 4×
- Samson v. United StatesN.D. New York· 1956-05-18· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brewster v. GageSupreme Court· 1930-01-06· cited 599×
- Irwin v. GavitSupreme Court· 1925-04-27· cited 406×
- United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court· 1928-02-20· cited 161×
- Burnet v. WhitehouseSupreme Court· 1931-04-13· cited 160×
- Baltzell v. MitchellFirst Circuit· 1925-01-14· cited 49×
- Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court· 1929-01-07· cited 48×
- Whitcomb v. BlairD.C. Circuit· 1928-04-02· cited 16×
- Abell v. TaitFourth Circuit· 1929-01-14· cited 15×
- Merle-Smith v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSecond Circuit· 1930-06-30· cited 14×
- Hubbell v. BurnetEighth Circuit· 1931-01-07· cited 13×
- Codman v. MilesFourth Circuit· 1928-10-22· cited 12×
- Rose v. GrantFifth Circuit· 1930-03-19· cited 10×
- Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. StapletonSupreme Court· 1928-10-08· cited 10×
- Kaufmann v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueThird Circuit· 1930-10-01· cited 6×
- Codman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueFirst Circuit· 1931-05-28· cited 6×
- Roxburghe v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1927-11-07· cited 5×
Other cases named Roxburghe v. Burnet
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.