Roxann Franklin Mason v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] suit that has been dismissed with prejudice cannot be refiled; the refiling is blocked by the doctrine of res judicata.”
• “[T]he Tucker Act does not contain a waiver of sovereign immunity in the district court for breach of a Title VII settlement agreement seeking damages in excess of $10,000.” (emphasis added)
• “[T]he Tucker Act does not contain a waiver of sovereign immunity in the district court for breach of a Title VII set- tlement agreement seeking damages in excess of $10,000.” (emphasis added)
• “If a separate waiver of sovereign immunity and grant of jurisdiction exist, district courts may hear cases over which, under the Tucker Act alone, the Court of Federal Claims would have exclusive jurisdiction.” (citation omitted)
• “We have construed the Tucker Act . . . to provide for exclusive jurisdiction in the Court of Federal Claims for contract disputes seeking more than $10,000 in damages [unless an independent grant of jurisdiction exists].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).