Skip to main content
· 10/1/2002

Rox Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 807 A.2d 906
  • 570 Pa. 60
  • 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence offered for a limited purpose cannot support findings beyond that purpose
  • holding that failure to raise issue before WCJ constituted waiver
  • discussing Folino’s holding that a summary offense conviction is inadmissible unless the summary offense is a necessary operative fact in a felony or misdemeanor conviction
  • refusing to address the substance of employer's contention regarding the meaning and application of certain amendments to a Section 301(c) exception inasmuch as the exception was waived
  • providing that issues not sufficiently preserved below are deemed waived
  • affirming con- elusion of Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board that Workers’ Compensation Judge’s finding violated Walker rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.