Skip to main content
· 10/24/1994

Rowson v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.

Citations

  • 866 F. Supp. 1221
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16866
  • 1994 WL 587883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that belated affidavit could be considered where affi-ant's memory was recently, refreshed by photographs which he had not been shown during deposition
  • holding that a belated affidavit could be considered where the affiant’s memory was recently refreshed by photographs that he had not been.shown during the deposition
  • holding that belated affidavit could be considered where affiant’s memory was recently refreshed by photographs which he had not been shown during deposition
  • holding that a belated affidavit could be considered where the affiant’s memory was recently refreshed by photographs that he had not been shown during the deposition
  • “[A] plaintiff who does not read an allegedly inadequate warning cannot maintain a negligent-failure-to-adequately-warn action unless the nature of the alleged inadequacy is such that it prevents him from reading it.” (quoting E.R. Squibb, 477 So.2d at 970-71)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.