Rowlett v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “PUTSA has displaced Pennsylvania’s common law tort for misappropriation of trade secrets, but has essentially retained its definition of trade secret. . . . Pre- PUTSA case law thus remains relevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).