Rowland v. Novus Financial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “a state foreclosure proceeding [is] purely private and hence [does] not implicate important states interests [under Younger].”
• denying a motion for summary judgment because conflicting copies of the Notice of Right to Cancel created a triable issue of fact
• denying a motion for summary judgment because conflicting copies of the Notice of Right to Cancel created a triable issue of fact
• denying 16 summary judgment despite signed forms when borrower produced conflicting evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).