Rowland v. McCown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the money-laundering statute “does not require the indictment to specify which unlawful activity generated the funds in question”
• affirming the rejection of a restitution credit where the defendant “was unable to provide reliable evidence supporting its [offset] claims”
• affirming the denial of restitution offsets where the defendant was unable to provide reliable evidence supporting her claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).