Rowland & Rowland, P.C. v. Texas Employers Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding allegedly tortious distribution of funds in derogation of worker’s compensation lien was a contact supporting specific jurisdiction
• holding firm’s representation to a Texas worker’s compensation carrier that it would protect its subrogation interest, which occurred during its representation of its Texas clients, supported specific jurisdiction
• “[T]he mere fact that Rowland & Rowland is not physically located in Texas is not persuasive in deciding personal jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).