· 7/1/1849
Rowell v. Small
Citations
- 30 Me. 30
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating fact-finder is sole judge of credibility of witnesses and may choose to believe one witness over another
- finding evidence sufficient to support verdict that plaintiff was first to breach
- finding evidence factually sufficient to support $100,000 award for damage to reputation
- “[P]arol evidence of the parties’ 27 intent is not admissible to vary the terms of an otherwise unambiguous instrument”
- party waived complaint that jury’s award of no attorney’s fees was against great weight and preponderance of evidence by not filing motion for new trial
- noting five ways to preserve no- evidence challenge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orally, Wells
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.