· 2/25/2015
Rowell, David Lewis
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Younger prohibits federal courts from “taking jurisdiction over federal constitutional claims that involve or call into question ongoing state proceedings,” including ongoing supervision of a probation
- noting that both parole agents and district attorneys are entitled to absolute immunity for decisions related to initiating criminal or parole charges
- ruling conditions of probation must be challenged through habeas petition
- ruling conditions of probation must be challenged through habeas petition
- ruling conditions of probation must be challenged through habeas petition
- disapproving of judicial notice taken of court records of appellant’s arrest date because the date was subject to reasonable dispute and court records “may contain erroneous information”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.