Skip to main content
· 2/25/2015

Rowell, David Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Younger prohibits federal courts from “taking jurisdiction over federal constitutional claims that involve or call into question ongoing state proceedings,” including ongoing supervision of a probation
  • noting that both parole agents and district attorneys are entitled to absolute immunity for decisions related to initiating criminal or parole charges
  • ruling conditions of probation must be challenged through habeas petition
  • ruling conditions of probation must be challenged through habeas petition
  • ruling conditions of probation must be challenged through habeas petition
  • disapproving of judicial notice taken of court records of appellant’s arrest date because the date was subject to reasonable dispute and court records “may contain erroneous information”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.