Rowe v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where one member of an appellate panel concurs in result only, and another panel member dissents, there is no majority and the opinion does not stand as precedent
• declining, in supermarket slip and fall cases, to adopt “negligent method of operation” theory which would require a continuous duty to look out for the safety of patrons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).