Skip to main content

Rowe v. Mazel Thirty, LLC

Citations

  • 209 N.J. 35
  • 34 A.3d 1248
  • 2012 WL 301049
  • 2012 N.J. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that landowner’s duty of reasonable care to business invitee “encompasses the duty to conduct a reasonable inspection to discover latent dangerous conditions”
  • noting that \the moving party is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law\ unless \there is a genuine issue as to any material fact\
  • noting that the common law categories of trespasser, licensee, and invitee, and the corresponding duty for each, are a shorthand for a full duty analysis under Hopkins
  • noting that landowner’s duty of reasonable care to business invitee “ ‘encompasses the duty to conduct a reasonable inspection to discover latent dangerous conditions’ ” (quoting Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors, 132 N.J. 426, 434, 625 A.2d 1110 (1993))
  • explaining duty owed to invitee (quoting Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo Realtors, 132 N.J. 426, 434 (1993))
  • second quotation citing Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 142 N.J. 520, 529 (1995)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Long

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.