Rowe v. Hobbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing psychologist’s testimony that parent’s intellectual disability was “permanent and incapable of treatment” was among evidence satisfying section 161.003(a)(2)
• noting that the child’s need for permanence through the establishment of a stable, permanent home is the paramount consideration in a best-interest determination
• noting that a child’s need for permanence through the establishment of a stable, permanent home is the paramount consideration in a best-interest determination
• noting that child’s need for permanence through establishment of stable, permanent home is paramount consideration in best-interest determination
• noting that a child’s need for permanence through the establishment of a stable, permanent home is the paramount consideration in a best-interest determination
• noting that a child’s need for permanence through the establishment of a stable, permanent home is the paramount consideration in a best-interest determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).