Rowan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Citations

• 105 Wash. 432
• 178 P. 473
• 1919 Wash. LEXIS 603

Syllabus

<p>Fbaudulent Conveyances (84, 92)—Preferences — To Relatives—Evidence—Sufficiency. No fraudulent intent is shown hy a sale hy a father to a son of ten mules and other property in satisfaction of a debt for $1,000, where the only evidence as to the consideration was that of father and son which showed it to he adequate, and if the father was insolvent at the time he did not know it.</p> <p>Same (41, 95)—Preferences—Retaining Possession—Intent— Evidence—Sufficiency. Fraudulent intent in the sale hy a father to a son of ten mules and other property in satisfaction of a debt for $1,000, is not shown hy the fact that there was no apparent change of possession, where it appears that they were living together, the son ran the farm, paid the hills, and exercised exclusive control over the property and listed it for assessment as the owner.</p>