Rowan v. Tinder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing that commingling is a consideration in the final “just and proper” determination which includes considering the reliance of the parties on the asset as a joint asset
• “If the debt was incurred to pay family expenses, equal division of the debt is generally appropriate.”
• “[W]e are bound by the trial court’s express and implicit factual findings if they are supported by any evidence in the record * * *.”
• “[W]e are bound by the trial court’s express and implicit factual findings if they are supported by any evidence in the record [.]”
• “If the debt was incurred to pay family expenses, equal division of the debt is generally appropriate.”
• when the Court of Appeals does not exercise its discretion to review an equitable action de novo, it is bound by the trial court’s findings of fact that are supported by any evidence in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).