Skip to main content
· 1/15/1838

Rowan v. Judge

Citations

  • 7 Port. 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Contract interpretation is a matter of law and thus may be addressed by the Court in resolving a motion to dismiss.”
  • “Contract interpretation is a matter of law and thus may be addressed by the Court in resolving a motion to dismiss.”
  • “Contract interpretation is a matter of law and thus may be addressed by the Court in resolving a motion to dismiss.”
  • Within 60 days of receipt of claims in excess of $100,000, the CO must either make final decision or disclose timing of final decision.
  • “The government has not contested jurisdiction. The Court nonetheless has an independent obligation to satisfy itself that jurisdiction exists over the claims presented by the Complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.